<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Subscribers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/</link>
	<description>Marketing at Eclipse</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/#comment-14719</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/#comment-14719</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian,

yes, you are right, I misread the article. It also mentions other problems (e.g. non-existing feeds) but these really only seem to affect feeds in the bundles - still these problems make me a little skeptical about the numbers. I also missed the followup-post on the Reader blog where the differences between the Reader and Feedburner numbers are explained: http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2007/10/subscriber-stats-summed-up.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian,</p>
<p>yes, you are right, I misread the article. It also mentions other problems (e.g. non-existing feeds) but these really only seem to affect feeds in the bundles - still these problems make me a little skeptical about the numbers. I also missed the followup-post on the Reader blog where the differences between the Reader and Feedburner numbers are explained: <a href="http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2007/10/subscriber-stats-summed-up.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2007/10/subscriber-stats-summed-up.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianskerrett</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/#comment-14697</link>
		<dc:creator>ianskerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/#comment-14697</guid>
		<description>marko,

Ya I saw this blog post but it was mainly talking about the default feeds that Google Reader include in their bundles.   I don't think Eclipse is in any of those bundles so I don't think it would apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marko,</p>
<p>Ya I saw this blog post but it was mainly talking about the default feeds that Google Reader include in their bundles.   I don&#8217;t think Eclipse is in any of those bundles so I don&#8217;t think it would apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/#comment-14695</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/google-reader-subscribers/#comment-14695</guid>
		<description>The numbers reported by the Google Reader are highly questionable, as a lot of people already reported the last days. See e.g. http://mashable.com/2007/10/15/google-reader-stats-are-bullshit-with-proof/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers reported by the Google Reader are highly questionable, as a lot of people already reported the last days. See e.g. <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/10/15/google-reader-stats-are-bullshit-with-proof/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2007/10/15/google-reader-stats-are-bullshit-with-proof/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
