<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source projects at GOSCON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/</link>
	<description>Marketing at Eclipse</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ianskerrett</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14698</link>
		<dc:creator>ianskerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14698</guid>
		<description>Shawn,

I tend to agree.  .Net shops tend to have a fear of trying to hire Java resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn,</p>
<p>I tend to agree.  .Net shops tend to have a fear of trying to hire Java resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Kasulka</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Kasulka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>The .NET↔Java issues with the Gateway is not integration but an adoption issue.  There are states that could take this and be up and running in a few weeks (and replace manual process they have in place).  But they don't,'because we are a .Net shop'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .NET↔Java issues with the Gateway is not integration but an adoption issue.  There are states that could take this and be up and running in a few weeks (and replace manual process they have in place).  But they don&#8217;t,&#8217;because we are a .Net shop&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asbjørn Ulsberg</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14652</link>
		<dc:creator>Asbjørn Ulsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14652</guid>
		<description>A preview would be nice. ;-) There was supposed to be some arrows between ".NET" and "Java" there. Let's try with some Unicode instead: .NET↔Java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A preview would be nice. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> There was supposed to be some arrows between &#8220;.NET&#8221; and &#8220;Java&#8221; there. Let&#8217;s try with some Unicode instead: .NET↔Java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asbjørn Ulsberg</title>
		<link>http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14651</link>
		<dc:creator>Asbjørn Ulsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/open-source-projects-at-goscon/#comment-14651</guid>
		<description>The .NETJava "problem" can in most cases easilly be solved with IKVM. It's at least worth looking into before you conclude that the difference in frameworks makes integration impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .NETJava &#8220;problem&#8221; can in most cases easilly be solved with IKVM. It&#8217;s at least worth looking into before you conclude that the difference in frameworks makes integration impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
